When holding the Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS (CMOP.L) ETF, how long should you stay invested to have high probability to achieve a positive return?
Over the selected period (~155 years), the longest duration with a negative return was 900 months (from February 1874 to January 1949).
This indicates that, within the same timeframe, any rolling period of 901 months or more has consistently resulted in a positive return.
Understanding this metric is crucial as it highlights the importance of a safe investment horizon. Knowing the minimum duration required to likely see positive returns helps investors set realistic expectations and reinforces the strategy of staying invested through market cycles. This approach can mitigate the emotional reactions to short-term market fluctuations and enhance the likelihood of achieving financial goals.
Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS (CMOP.L) ETF: Historical Returns
Previous vs subsequent Returns
Is there a correlation between past and future returns over all 10-year rolling periods?
The following chart illustrates the relationship between past returns (x-axis) and subsequent returns (y-axis).
Data points are aggregated to show occurrences, and you can zoom in by clicking or drawing over the desired area.
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
As of Dec 31, 2025, the annualized return of the previous 10 years has been 7.42%.
Rolling Returns
A rolling return is a measure of investment performance that calculates the return of an investment over a set period of time, with the starting date rolling forward. This approach can provide a more accurate representation of the investment's historical performance and helps investors to evaluate the investment's consistency over time.
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Rolling Period Analysis
By selecting the 'Rolling Period', the chart and data will update. To study a different date range, change the simulation settings.
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
| Worst | Median | Best | Negative Periods |
|---|---|---|---|
|
-39.58%
Sep 1997 - Aug 1998 |
+1.78% |
+102.79%
Aug 1972 - Jul 1973 |
40.51%
749 out of 1849 |
|
-40.37%
Sep 1997 - Aug 1998 |
-0.41% |
+85.30%
Aug 1972 - Jul 1973 |
52.35%
968 out of 1849 |
|
-29.39%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1921 |
+1.52% |
+73.99%
Feb 1972 - Jan 1974 |
39.03%
717 out of 1837 |
|
-27.09%
Feb 1997 - Jan 1999 |
-0.32% |
+58.41%
Feb 1972 - Jan 1974 |
52.15%
958 out of 1837 |
|
-20.65%
Feb 2013 - Jan 2016 |
+1.74% |
+61.59%
Nov 1971 - Oct 1974 |
35.07%
640 out of 1825 |
|
-21.30%
Feb 2013 - Jan 2016 |
-0.68% |
+44.85%
Nov 1971 - Oct 1974 |
55.45%
1012 out of 1825 |
|
-16.02%
Mar 2012 - Feb 2016 |
+1.81% |
+47.78%
Dec 1970 - Nov 1974 |
30.67%
556 out of 1813 |
|
-19.86%
Feb 1917 - Jan 1921 |
-0.48% |
+32.78%
Dec 1970 - Nov 1974 |
54.61%
990 out of 1813 |
|
-13.43%
Apr 2011 - Mar 2016 |
+1.83% |
+39.05%
Dec 1969 - Nov 1974 |
31.98%
576 out of 1801 |
|
-19.34%
Feb 1916 - Jan 1921 |
-0.33% |
+25.72%
Dec 1969 - Nov 1974 |
54.03%
973 out of 1801 |
|
-9.73%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1925 |
+1.71% |
+33.53%
Jun 1970 - May 1976 |
33.20%
594 out of 1789 |
|
-15.74%
Feb 1915 - Jan 1921 |
-0.09% |
+19.56%
Dec 1968 - Nov 1974 |
51.26%
917 out of 1789 |
|
-9.39%
Sep 2008 - Aug 2015 |
+1.77% |
+27.75%
Jun 1969 - May 1976 |
29.94%
532 out of 1777 |
|
-12.67%
Feb 1914 - Jan 1921 |
-0.19% |
+18.39%
Jan 1999 - Dec 2005 |
53.35%
948 out of 1777 |
|
-8.55%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1927 |
+1.78% |
+25.93%
Jun 1970 - May 1978 |
33.54%
592 out of 1765 |
|
-11.85%
Feb 1913 - Jan 1921 |
-0.26% |
+14.51%
Dec 1966 - Nov 1974 |
53.48%
944 out of 1765 |
|
-7.46%
May 2011 - Apr 2020 |
+1.65% |
+23.61%
Oct 1971 - Sep 1980 |
32.74%
574 out of 1753 |
|
-10.88%
Aug 1912 - Jul 1921 |
-0.20% |
+16.48%
Mar 1999 - Feb 2008 |
53.22%
933 out of 1753 |
|
-7.20%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1929 |
+1.57% |
+22.08%
Feb 1970 - Jan 1980 |
34.06%
593 out of 1741 |
|
-10.09%
Feb 1911 - Jan 1921 |
-0.14% |
+14.77%
Sep 1998 - Aug 2008 |
52.33%
911 out of 1741 |
|
-7.25%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1930 |
+1.44% |
+21.36%
Apr 1972 - Mar 1983 |
31.35%
542 out of 1729 |
|
-9.18%
May 1910 - Apr 1921 |
-0.13% |
+11.22%
Mar 1999 - Feb 2010 |
52.17%
902 out of 1729 |
|
-6.17%
Jul 2008 - Jun 2020 |
+1.58% |
+21.27%
Jun 1972 - May 1984 |
31.51%
541 out of 1717 |
|
-8.69%
Mar 1909 - Feb 1921 |
-0.19% |
+11.37%
Mar 1999 - Feb 2011 |
54.11%
929 out of 1717 |
|
-6.48%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1932 |
+1.68% |
+21.72%
Mar 1972 - Feb 1985 |
31.55%
538 out of 1705 |
|
-7.63%
Feb 1908 - Jan 1921 |
-0.18% |
+10.83%
Jul 1995 - Jun 2008 |
53.08%
905 out of 1705 |
|
-6.21%
Feb 1917 - Jan 1931 |
+1.69% |
+20.98%
Mar 1971 - Feb 1985 |
29.53%
500 out of 1693 |
|
-7.77%
May 1907 - Apr 1921 |
-0.25% |
+9.12%
Jul 1994 - Jun 2008 |
54.34%
920 out of 1693 |
|
-5.57%
Feb 1916 - Jan 1931 |
+1.79% |
+20.46%
Mar 1970 - Feb 1985 |
28.61%
481 out of 1681 |
|
-7.19%
Feb 1906 - Jan 1921 |
-0.19% |
+8.85%
Jan 1982 - Dec 1996 |
56.16%
944 out of 1681 |
|
-4.91%
Jan 1917 - Dec 1932 |
+1.94% |
+19.04%
Mar 1969 - Feb 1985 |
25.52%
426 out of 1669 |
|
-6.55%
Jun 1905 - May 1921 |
-0.21% |
+8.67%
Jul 1992 - Jun 2008 |
57.40%
958 out of 1669 |
|
-4.42%
Jan 1917 - Dec 1933 |
+1.90% |
+18.07%
Jun 1972 - May 1989 |
23.96%
397 out of 1657 |
|
-5.95%
Feb 1913 - Jan 1930 |
-0.24% |
+8.60%
Oct 1988 - Sep 2005 |
57.09%
946 out of 1657 |
|
-3.53%
Feb 1916 - Jan 1934 |
+1.88% |
+18.59%
Jan 1972 - Dec 1989 |
24.26%
399 out of 1645 |
|
-5.75%
Feb 1912 - Jan 1930 |
-0.23% |
+8.86%
Jan 1988 - Dec 2005 |
58.30%
959 out of 1645 |
|
-3.18%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1938 |
+1.96% |
+19.61%
Oct 1971 - Sep 1990 |
23.82%
389 out of 1633 |
|
-5.61%
Feb 1911 - Jan 1930 |
-0.25% |
+8.92%
Oct 1971 - Sep 1990 |
56.52%
923 out of 1633 |
|
-2.79%
Feb 1918 - Jan 1938 |
+2.04% |
+18.78%
Oct 1970 - Sep 1990 |
25.97%
421 out of 1621 |
|
-5.32%
Feb 1911 - Jan 1931 |
-0.21% |
+9.02%
Jul 1988 - Jun 2008 |
57.06%
925 out of 1621 |
|
-2.25%
Feb 1906 - Jan 1931 |
+2.42% |
+16.06%
Oct 1971 - Sep 1996 |
29.72%
464 out of 1561 |
|
-4.49%
Feb 1906 - Jan 1931 |
-0.11% |
+7.88%
Jul 1983 - Jun 2008 |
54.39%
849 out of 1561 |
|
-1.57%
Feb 1900 - Jan 1930 |
+2.24% |
+14.77%
Dec 1970 - Nov 2000 |
31.51%
473 out of 1501 |
|
-3.66%
May 1891 - Apr 1921 |
-0.20% |
+6.99%
Dec 1970 - Nov 2000 |
54.83%
823 out of 1501 |
Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS (CMOP.L) ETF: Historical Returns

