When holding the Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS (CMOP.L) ETF, how long should you stay invested to have high probability to achieve a positive return?
Over the selected period (~155 years), the longest duration with a negative return was 900 months (from February 1874 to January 1949).
This indicates that, within the same timeframe, any rolling period of 901 months or more has consistently resulted in a positive return.
Understanding this metric is crucial as it highlights the importance of a safe investment horizon. Knowing the minimum duration required to likely see positive returns helps investors set realistic expectations and reinforces the strategy of staying invested through market cycles. This approach can mitigate the emotional reactions to short-term market fluctuations and enhance the likelihood of achieving financial goals.
Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS (CMOP.L) ETF: Historical Returns
Previous vs subsequent Returns
Is there a correlation between past and future returns over all 10-year rolling periods?
The following chart illustrates the relationship between past returns (x-axis) and subsequent returns (y-axis).
Data points are aggregated to show occurrences, and you can zoom in by clicking or drawing over the desired area.
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
As of Jul 31, 2025, the annualized return of the previous 10 years has been 5.38%.
Rolling Returns
A rolling return is a measure of investment performance that calculates the return of an investment over a set period of time, with the starting date rolling forward. This approach can provide a more accurate representation of the investment's historical performance and helps investors to evaluate the investment's consistency over time.
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Rolling Period Analysis
By selecting the 'Rolling Period', the chart and data will update. To study a different date range, change the simulation settings.
Loading data
Please wait
Loading data
Please wait
Worst | Median | Best | Negative Periods |
---|---|---|---|
-39.58%
Sep 1997 - Aug 1998 |
+1.76% |
+102.79%
Aug 1972 - Jul 1973 |
40.62%
749 out of 1844 |
-40.37%
Sep 1997 - Aug 1998 |
-0.41% |
+85.30%
Aug 1972 - Jul 1973 |
52.49%
968 out of 1844 |
-29.39%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1921 |
+1.52% |
+73.99%
Feb 1972 - Jan 1974 |
39.03%
715 out of 1832 |
-27.09%
Feb 1997 - Jan 1999 |
-0.32% |
+58.41%
Feb 1972 - Jan 1974 |
52.13%
955 out of 1832 |
-20.65%
Feb 2013 - Jan 2016 |
+1.75% |
+61.59%
Nov 1971 - Oct 1974 |
34.95%
636 out of 1820 |
-21.30%
Feb 2013 - Jan 2016 |
-0.68% |
+44.85%
Nov 1971 - Oct 1974 |
55.33%
1007 out of 1820 |
-16.02%
Mar 2012 - Feb 2016 |
+1.80% |
+47.78%
Dec 1970 - Nov 1974 |
30.75%
556 out of 1808 |
-19.86%
Feb 1917 - Jan 1921 |
-0.48% |
+32.78%
Dec 1970 - Nov 1974 |
54.65%
988 out of 1808 |
-13.43%
Apr 2011 - Mar 2016 |
+1.80% |
+39.05%
Dec 1969 - Nov 1974 |
32.07%
576 out of 1796 |
-19.34%
Feb 1916 - Jan 1921 |
-0.33% |
+25.72%
Dec 1969 - Nov 1974 |
54.18%
973 out of 1796 |
-9.73%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1925 |
+1.66% |
+33.53%
Jun 1970 - May 1976 |
33.30%
594 out of 1784 |
-15.74%
Feb 1915 - Jan 1921 |
-0.13% |
+19.56%
Dec 1968 - Nov 1974 |
51.40%
917 out of 1784 |
-9.39%
Sep 2008 - Aug 2015 |
+1.77% |
+27.75%
Jun 1969 - May 1976 |
30.02%
532 out of 1772 |
-12.67%
Feb 1914 - Jan 1921 |
-0.19% |
+18.39%
Jan 1999 - Dec 2005 |
53.50%
948 out of 1772 |
-8.55%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1927 |
+1.78% |
+25.93%
Jun 1970 - May 1978 |
33.64%
592 out of 1760 |
-11.85%
Feb 1913 - Jan 1921 |
-0.27% |
+14.51%
Dec 1966 - Nov 1974 |
53.64%
944 out of 1760 |
-7.46%
May 2011 - Apr 2020 |
+1.60% |
+23.61%
Oct 1971 - Sep 1980 |
32.84%
574 out of 1748 |
-10.88%
Aug 1912 - Jul 1921 |
-0.21% |
+16.48%
Mar 1999 - Feb 2008 |
53.38%
933 out of 1748 |
-7.20%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1929 |
+1.57% |
+22.08%
Feb 1970 - Jan 1980 |
34.16%
593 out of 1736 |
-10.09%
Feb 1911 - Jan 1921 |
-0.15% |
+14.77%
Sep 1998 - Aug 2008 |
52.48%
911 out of 1736 |
-7.25%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1930 |
+1.42% |
+21.36%
Apr 1972 - Mar 1983 |
31.44%
542 out of 1724 |
-9.18%
May 1910 - Apr 1921 |
-0.13% |
+11.22%
Mar 1999 - Feb 2010 |
52.15%
899 out of 1724 |
-6.17%
Jul 2008 - Jun 2020 |
+1.61% |
+21.27%
Jun 1972 - May 1984 |
31.54%
540 out of 1712 |
-8.69%
Mar 1909 - Feb 1921 |
-0.19% |
+11.37%
Mar 1999 - Feb 2011 |
53.97%
924 out of 1712 |
-6.48%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1932 |
+1.71% |
+21.72%
Mar 1972 - Feb 1985 |
31.53%
536 out of 1700 |
-7.63%
Feb 1908 - Jan 1921 |
-0.17% |
+10.83%
Jul 1995 - Jun 2008 |
52.94%
900 out of 1700 |
-6.21%
Feb 1917 - Jan 1931 |
+1.69% |
+20.98%
Mar 1971 - Feb 1985 |
29.56%
499 out of 1688 |
-7.77%
May 1907 - Apr 1921 |
-0.25% |
+9.12%
Jul 1994 - Jun 2008 |
54.21%
915 out of 1688 |
-5.57%
Feb 1916 - Jan 1931 |
+1.83% |
+20.46%
Mar 1970 - Feb 1985 |
28.70%
481 out of 1676 |
-7.19%
Feb 1906 - Jan 1921 |
-0.18% |
+8.85%
Jan 1982 - Dec 1996 |
56.03%
939 out of 1676 |
-4.91%
Jan 1917 - Dec 1932 |
+1.94% |
+19.04%
Mar 1969 - Feb 1985 |
25.60%
426 out of 1664 |
-6.55%
Jun 1905 - May 1921 |
-0.21% |
+8.67%
Jul 1992 - Jun 2008 |
57.27%
953 out of 1664 |
-4.42%
Jan 1917 - Dec 1933 |
+1.90% |
+18.07%
Jun 1972 - May 1989 |
23.91%
395 out of 1652 |
-5.95%
Feb 1913 - Jan 1930 |
-0.24% |
+8.60%
Oct 1988 - Sep 2005 |
56.96%
941 out of 1652 |
-3.53%
Feb 1916 - Jan 1934 |
+1.89% |
+18.59%
Jan 1972 - Dec 1989 |
24.33%
399 out of 1640 |
-5.75%
Feb 1912 - Jan 1930 |
-0.23% |
+8.86%
Jan 1988 - Dec 2005 |
58.17%
954 out of 1640 |
-3.18%
Jan 1920 - Dec 1938 |
+1.95% |
+19.61%
Oct 1971 - Sep 1990 |
23.89%
389 out of 1628 |
-5.61%
Feb 1911 - Jan 1930 |
-0.25% |
+8.92%
Oct 1971 - Sep 1990 |
56.39%
918 out of 1628 |
-2.79%
Feb 1918 - Jan 1938 |
+2.07% |
+18.78%
Oct 1970 - Sep 1990 |
26.05%
421 out of 1616 |
-5.32%
Feb 1911 - Jan 1931 |
-0.21% |
+9.02%
Jul 1988 - Jun 2008 |
56.93%
920 out of 1616 |
-2.25%
Feb 1906 - Jan 1931 |
+2.37% |
+16.06%
Oct 1971 - Sep 1996 |
29.82%
464 out of 1556 |
-4.49%
Feb 1906 - Jan 1931 |
-0.11% |
+7.88%
Jul 1983 - Jun 2008 |
54.43%
847 out of 1556 |
-1.57%
Feb 1900 - Jan 1930 |
+2.23% |
+14.77%
Dec 1970 - Nov 2000 |
31.62%
473 out of 1496 |
-3.66%
May 1891 - Apr 1921 |
-0.22% |
+6.99%
Dec 1970 - Nov 2000 |
55.01%
823 out of 1496 |
Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS (CMOP.L) ETF: Historical Returns